Ever Wondered Why Women's Clothes Don't Have Pockets? Here's A Clear Explanation Why

And fake pockets are just the worst!

Sophia
Ever Wondered Why Women's Clothes Don't Have Pockets?  Here's A Clear Explanation Why

In the times before, women’s clothing did not have any pockets. It first sounds unfair because they are just pockets after all… what is with all the gender discrimination?

Most people would so easily just create a conclusion from just that. But there’s a historical explanation as to why the fashion industry in the old times did not– and some other details too.

Pockets were only added to men’s clothing by tailors in the 17th century. Women also had some sort of pockets, however by that time, the only “pockets” considered for women were in the form of a pouch tied around their waist, but here’s the thing, it was under 3 layers of clothing, which was hard to reach.

TikTok user and video content creator @dougiesharpe, also known as “fact guy”, shared some historical nuggets of wisdom about why women’s clothing did not have any pockets before. As you watch the TikTIk video, you will understand that this case is more than just women’s clothing having pockets.

This part of clothing opens the door to knowing and acknowledging women’s rights, the suffrage movement, revolutions, and many more important events. Who knew pockets, as little as they can be, could be such a big part of history, especially to women?

@dougiesharpe just making useful content out there, kudos!

@dougiesharpe just making useful content out there, kudos!@dougiesharpe

He shared that the people in the handbag industry had something to do with this case of why women’s pockets did not have any pockets back then. He then quotes Christian Dior in a very intriguing saying.

He shared that the people in the handbag industry had something to do with this case of why women’s pockets did not have any pockets back then. He then quotes Christian Dior in a very intriguing saying.@dougiesharpe

Pockets before were not really the kind of pockets we think of now. They were pouches, a separate part, which is surprising.

Pockets before were not really the kind of pockets we think of now. They were pouches, a separate part, which is surprising.@dougiesharpe

So, pouches is equal to pockets in the middle ages?

So, pouches is equal to pockets in the middle ages?@dougiesharpe

Well, they wore dresses with many layers before, maybe pockets weren’t ideal with the “dress code”?

Well, they wore dresses with many layers before, maybe pockets weren’t ideal with the “dress code”?@dougiesharpe

And we know for a fact that women’s clothing or dresses before were heavy. Isn’t that good enough a reason to have pockets?

And we know for a fact that women’s clothing or dresses before were heavy. Isn’t that good enough a reason to have pockets?@dougiesharpe

Well, pockets are supposed to be accessible. They are clothing compartments after all.

Well, pockets are supposed to be accessible. They are clothing compartments after all.@dougiesharpe

Poor kid…couldn’t reach her own pocket.

Poor kid…couldn’t reach her own pocket.@dougiesharpe

Thankful to that tailor who thought that pockets were a NEED.

Thankful to that tailor who thought that pockets were a NEED.@dougiesharpe

Finally, a clothing evolution!

Finally, a clothing evolution!@dougiesharpe

Women really had to bring something conveniently...

Women really had to bring something conveniently...@dougiesharpe

But it was hard without pockets.

But it was hard without pockets.@dougiesharpe

Surely someone carries something? Isn’t that a good reason?

Surely someone carries something? Isn’t that a good reason?@dougiesharpe

They were starting to get scared of women having pockets. That could have been a statement.

They were starting to get scared of women having pockets. That could have been a statement.@dougiesharpe

Just a pocket, saving and giving women rights!

Just a pocket, saving and giving women rights!@dougiesharpe

Never underestimate a pocket and how it was a starter to give justice to women’s suffrage.

Never underestimate a pocket and how it was a starter to give justice to women’s suffrage.@dougiesharpe

Still funny and amazing to think that this all started because they didn’t see pockets as a need for women.

Still funny and amazing to think that this all started because they didn’t see pockets as a need for women.@dougiesharpe

What people before did not see: pockets suits women!

What people before did not see: pockets suits women!@dougiesharpe

Can we call this the pocket revolution?

Can we call this the pocket revolution?@dougiesharpe

Show them pockets off, ladies!

Show them pockets off, ladies!@dougiesharpe

Now, the fashion industry enters the picture…

Now, the fashion industry enters the picture…@dougiesharpe

Pockets now became a fashion statement.

Pockets now became a fashion statement.@dougiesharpe

See how pockets were so useful.

See how pockets were so useful.@dougiesharpe

Not only functional, but it’s essential!

Not only functional, but it’s essential!@dougiesharpe

Just another win for women.

Just another win for women.@dougiesharpe

Keep those smiles, ladies!

Keep those smiles, ladies!@dougiesharpe

But there were still days that the no-pocket clothing made a return.

But there were still days that the no-pocket clothing made a return.@dougiesharpe

1950’s fashion without the pockets, was it a downgrade or a break?

1950’s fashion without the pockets, was it a downgrade or a break?@dougiesharpe

It was time to shine for the handbag industry.

It was time to shine for the handbag industry.@dougiesharpe

One of the greatest collaborations in the fashion industry.

One of the greatest collaborations in the fashion industry.@dougiesharpe

You can watch the Tiktok video here:

@dougiesharpe I had no idea how deep this went. Collusion between the handbag industry and the womens fashion industry is the reason why womens clothing doesn’t have pockets #womensfashion #womensrights #womenssufferage #pocket #womenspockets #funfact #funfacts #edutok #historytok #womenstok #fact #facts #clothinghistory #handbag #handbaghistory #tailor #clothing ♬ original sound - dougiesharpe

Never underestimate how little something or anything is. It could be just a speck of dust, a scratch on wood, a button on a shirt, anything at all because it might cause a revolution someday.

Who knew pockets could become a big part of the history of how women fought for their rights?

Comment down your thoughts, or share this article for all your family and friends to see!

Sophia